Hier hat zufäälig ein Freund gepostet, was haltet ihr davon .
http://www.naturalnews.com/041213_soy_warning_cancer_lab_tests.html
http://www.naturalnews.com/041213_soy_warning_cancer_lab_tests.html
NaturalNews.com (formerly Newstarget) is a website founded by Mike "the Health Ranger" Adams. The site promotes almost every sort of medical woo known, though it specializes in vaccine denialism,[1] AIDS/HIV denial,[2] quack cancer medicine[3] and conspiracy theories about modern medicine.[4] Even other quacks think it's a quack site.[5] The site has recently expanded its outlook to become an outlet for extreme environmentalism and conspiracy theorizing about Obama and gun control.
If you cite NaturalNews on any matter whatsoever, you are almost certainly wrong.
Among its most outspoken critics are "Orac" of ScienceBlogs,[9] who has called it "one of the most wretched hives of scum and quackery on the Internet," and the most "blatant purveyor of the worst kind of quackery and paranoid anti-physician and anti-medicine conspiracy theories anywhere on the Internet",[10] as well as Peter Bowditch of the website Ratbags,[11] and Jeff McMahon writing for Forbes.[12] Steven Novella has called NaturalNews "a crank alt med site that promotes every sort of medical nonsense imaginable. If it is unscientific, antiscientific, conspiracy-mongering, or downright silly, Mike Adams appears to be all for it – whatever sells the "natural" products he hawks on his site.".[13]
Other critics of Adams' website include astronomer and blogger Phil Plait,[14] PZ Myers,[15] and Brian Dunning, who listed it as #1 on his "Top 10 Worst Anti-Science Websites" list.[16] Adams is listed as a "promoter of questionable methods" by Quackwatch[17] and Robert T. Carroll at The Skeptic's Dictionary has said, "Natural News is not a very good source for information. If you don't trust me on this, go to Respectful Insolence or any of the other bloggers on ScienceBlogs and do a search for "Natural News" or "Mike Adams" (who is NaturalNews). Hundreds of entries will be found and not one of them will have a good word to say about Mike Adams as a source."[18]
|
|