Heute Training:
Klimmzüge Untergriff: 3*8 60kg
Rudern am Kabelzug: 3*8 40kg
Kniebeugen: 3*8 65kg
Bizeps-Langhantelcurls: 3*8 25kg
Trizeps am Seil: 3*8 30kg
Liegestütze: 2*12
Crunches + Beinheben
Pause: unter 60sec.
War richtig gut heute, freu mich schon wieder auf morgen. Muskeln fühlen sich in den letzten Tagen voller an... Gewicht schwankt unnormal, zwischen morgens und Abends 3-4kg Unterschied. Also eher nicht so aussagekräftig.
Nach dem Training ordentlich gefressen!
leider keine Kalorien gezählt, geschätzte 2000.
Mal etwas wissenschaftliches zu HFT:
Distribution of strength training volume into one or two daily sessions and neuromuscular adaptations in female athletes.
Häkkinen K, Kallinen M.
Department of Biology of Physical Activity, University of Jyväskylä, Finland.
Neuromuscular adaptations were investigated in ten female athletes during a “normal” intensive strength training period for 3-weeks (I) as well as during a separate second 3-week training period (II), when the same total training volume was distributed into two daily sessions. No systematic changes took place in the maximal voluntary neural activation (averaged integrated EMG) of the leg extensor muscles, in the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the quadriceps femoris muscle or in maximal voluntary isometric strength of the leg extensor muscles over training period I with one daily sessions. However, a significant increase was observed in maximal strength from 2493 +/- 553 to 2620 +/- 598 N (p < 0.05) during period II accompanied also by a significant (p < 0.05) enlargement in the cross-sectional area of the muscle and by slight (ns.) increases in the maximum IEMGs of the trained muscles. The individual changes in the maximum IEMGs of the trained muscles during period II correlated significantly (p < 0.01) with the individual changes in maximal strength. The present results with female athletes suggest that the distribution of the volume of intensive strength training into smaller units, such as two daily sessions, may create more optimal conditions not only for muscular hypertrophy but by producing effective training stimuli especially for the nervous system. These kinds of training conditions may lead to further strength development in athletes being greater than obtained during “normal” strength training of the same duration.
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1991;63(3-4):194-9.
Serum hormones in male strength athletes during intensive short term strength training.
Häkkinen K, Pakarinen A.
Department of Biology, University of Jyväskylä, Finland.
Training-induced adaptations in the endocrine system and strength development were investigated in nine male strength athletes during two separate 3-week intensive strength training periods. The overall amount of training in the periods was maintained at the same level. In both cases the training in the first 2 weeks was very intensive: this was followed by a 3rd week when the overall amount of training was greatly decreased. The two training periods differed only in that training period I included one daily session, while during the first 2 weeks of period II the same amount of training was divided between two daily sessions. In general, only slight and statistically insignificant changes occurred during training period I in mean concentrations of serum hormones examined or sex hormone-binding globulin as well as in maximal isometric leg extensor force. However, during training period II after 2 weeks of intensive strength training a significant decrease (P<0.05) was observed in serum free testosterone concentration [from 98.4 (SD 24.5) to 83.8 (SD 14.7) pmol · l–1] during the subsequent week of reduced training. No change in the concentration of total testosterone was observed. This training phase was also accompanied by significant increases (P<0.05) in serum luteinizing hormone (LH) and cortisol concentrations. After 2 successive days of rest serum free testosterone and LH returned to (P<0.05) their basal concentrations. Training period II led also to a significant increase (P<0.05) [from 3942 (SD 767) to 4151 (SD 926) N] in maximal force. These findings suggest that in male strength athletes dividing the amount of training into smaller units may create more effective training stimuli leading to further strength development.